tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15329279.post1569833228474446234..comments2023-08-25T05:18:29.312-06:00Comments on Madville Times: Adelstein: Powers Not Fit for Sec. State Flunkycaheidelbergerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03261598066395322681noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15329279.post-75570462749313815302010-12-21T07:11:27.376-07:002010-12-21T07:11:27.376-07:00Very interesting Cory, that connects the remaining...Very interesting Cory, that connects the remaining dots on Gant/Powers. Now I am sure that all Gants signs were supplied by Powers, a huge campaign finance law violation. He had more signs than someone running for President and I had the proof Powers Sign website had been used to promote gant's campaign. That I knew all along BUT certainly with this "pay back" of a position we can bet that Powers indeed supplied ALL Gants thousands of signs which would be a cost WAY in excess of allowed inkind contribution limits which is exactly as I suspected from the beginning of campaign.<br /><br />Enjoyed the article,<br /><br />LoriAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15329279.post-19027387971664742962010-12-17T22:04:18.144-07:002010-12-17T22:04:18.144-07:00Larry,
No, but Northern Valley Beacon was.Larry, <br /><br />No, but Northern Valley Beacon was.Erinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07413860558740847704noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15329279.post-75264691256111435162010-12-17T10:07:40.435-07:002010-12-17T10:07:40.435-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.larry kurtzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06855417104900624838noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15329279.post-52212492457879305312010-12-17T07:44:51.308-07:002010-12-17T07:44:51.308-07:00If public outcry forces the SOS to jettison Mr. Po...If public outcry forces the SOS to jettison Mr. Powers, might we expect that record to magically reappear?larry kurtzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06855417104900624838noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15329279.post-82829751260908496402010-12-17T07:43:51.848-07:002010-12-17T07:43:51.848-07:00Well Cory, if it was there once, it ain't ther...Well Cory, if it was there once, it ain't there now. Weird stuff going on over there. The "Ghost of Christmas Pat" maybe?Bill Fleminghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08319507693205848772noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15329279.post-29850309351539661732010-12-16T19:50:55.152-07:002010-12-16T19:50:55.152-07:00Bill, I think it was the link above, where Tyler o...Bill, I think it was the link above, where Tyler offers his excuse for the disappearance. <br /><br />Jim, interesting point. Trying to pin down copyright for every bit of content online is like trying to pin down copyright to your high school yearbook. Does each student retain copyright for each photo he or she took or each page he or she wrote? Do the people who sign their names in your copy afterward retain copyright to their recollections of that great party where everyone <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQQpbRN1FrE" rel="nofollow">sang Sophie B. Hawkins</a>?<br /><br />No blog exists alone. Hyperlinks and multilogue create the blogosphere's unique value. I say this is "my blog, my rules." I could clearly identify if someone was plagiarizing or otherwise stealing my original content for their own gain. But my blog is also deeply embedded in the public sphere. If I nuked this blog, I'd be blowing another whole in a rich public fabric of hyperlinked discourse in a way even more drastic than if we could make every copy of the <i>Madison Daily Leader</i> suddenly vanish.<br /><br />I will have trouble accepting a job that would not only require me to stop blogging but also delete all past blogging. Work should not demand such back-censorship.caheidelbergerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03261598066395322681noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15329279.post-75149465050062089522010-12-16T19:22:37.148-07:002010-12-16T19:22:37.148-07:00I don't know the policies you have on comment ...I don't know the policies you have on comment ownership; but on a lot of the blogs and aggregators I read the comments are the ownership and copyright of the commentators (commentors?). I also don't know the policies of SDWC. But with him not making the comments available to the commentators could be a breach of copyright. Can any of you who comment there access any of your old comments?<br />Also isn't it kind of, I don't want to say cowardly, but kind of weiney to make all the comments and post that he did and just because he gets a job where they might come back to bite him he just hides them?Jim Hocknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15329279.post-78424381507794977262010-12-16T11:27:29.050-07:002010-12-16T11:27:29.050-07:00Now there are no author names with posts. ip's...Now there are no author names with posts. ip's comments are being deleted by sending them to moderation. Pat's mug has disappeared from the address bar.larry kurtzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06855417104900624838noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15329279.post-90294393003409519052010-12-16T09:55:15.742-07:002010-12-16T09:55:15.742-07:00This is at the bottom of the webpage: "Design...This is at the bottom of the webpage: "Designed by Dating South Africa. In collaboration with Trabajo, Over 50 Dating, and Florist Jobs."larry kurtzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06855417104900624838noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15329279.post-65458245685036832712010-12-16T08:39:32.733-07:002010-12-16T08:39:32.733-07:00Which SDWC thread contains TC's deletion notic...Which SDWC thread contains TC's deletion notice, Cory?Bill Fleminghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08319507693205848772noreply@blogger.com