tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15329279.post4921843611507208548..comments2023-08-25T05:18:29.312-06:00Comments on Madville Times: Verbatim: James Orbinski on Engaged Citizenship and Debatecaheidelbergerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03261598066395322681noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15329279.post-4841263165660713962008-12-11T14:27:00.000-07:002008-12-11T14:27:00.000-07:00I can hear G. Gordon Liddy interviewing Barney Fra...I can hear G. Gordon Liddy interviewing Barney Frank on talk radio right now!<BR/><BR/>Even the best curve ball can sometimes be hit out of the park. Bring on the debate!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15329279.post-22273681929744198122008-12-11T08:00:00.000-07:002008-12-11T08:00:00.000-07:00Basically it is to get rid of talk radio. Nothing...Basically it is to get rid of talk radio. Nothing to do with any other medium, only radio. Liberal talk radio has equal opportunity to put on programs and has tried. In the free market if a product isn't popular, is not being bought, doesn't work, or isn't economically feasible, it fails. That's true fairness and equal opportunity, which is what we have now. If libs talk radio doesn't attract an audience to make it economically feasible, it's the fault of their content etc. Censoring other programs is not the answer.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15329279.post-51234573719815967542008-12-11T00:56:00.000-07:002008-12-11T00:56:00.000-07:00Would the Fairness Doctrine apply to all radio bro...Would the Fairness Doctrine apply to all radio broadcasts -- even National Public Radio and South Dakota Public Broadcasting?<BR/><BR/>Would it apply in the narrow sense (to each program individually) or in the broad sense (to the content of a given station's broadcasts overall)?<BR/><BR/>Would the Fairness Doctrine be two-sided (e.g., liberal vs. conservative), or would it be multifaceted and all-inclusive (e.g, Islam, Christian, Hindu, Buddhist, Atheist, Agnostic, etc.)?<BR/><BR/>This doctrine, if applied fairly, will give rise to plenty of engaged debate. But will it not also keep a lot of attorneys busy, transferring wealth from those with less (most of us) to those with more (lawyers)?<BR/><BR/>Ach! The road to ruin is paved with good intentions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15329279.post-3925365640389981182008-12-10T12:03:00.000-07:002008-12-10T12:03:00.000-07:00And I suppose Bush shuffling protesters out of the...And I suppose Bush shuffling protesters out of the way is worse than Obama and Pelosi's desire to implement the "(UN)fairness doctrine as it applies to talk radio. Wrong. I don't know the reasoning behind removing the protestors, but I do know the reasoning behind stifling free speech by the so-called Fairness Doctrine. <BR/><BR/>As it stands now, talk radio is a free market. If the program is popular, it succeeds. If not, it doesn't. Nothing unfair about that. And attempts to stifle talk radio is in effect censorship and stifles engaged citizenship and debate.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15329279.post-84790878589155836592008-12-10T06:21:00.000-07:002008-12-10T06:21:00.000-07:00GW Bush has won plaudits from BH Obama and world l...GW Bush has won <A HREF="http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/12/01/world.aids.day/" REL="nofollow">plaudits from BH Obama</A> and world leaders for his efforts to fight AIDS in Africa, although his broader record is <A HREF="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/02/25/opinion/main3873641.shtml" REL="nofollow">questionable</A>. However, relevant to the point highlighted here, Bush has regularly acted to <A HREF="http://www.commondreams.org/views03/1129-03.htm" REL="nofollow">stifle dissent and First Amendment rights</A>.caheidelbergerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03261598066395322681noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15329279.post-324422133433696122008-12-10T04:56:00.000-07:002008-12-10T04:56:00.000-07:00Don't forget GW Bush who has sent huge amounts of ...Don't forget GW Bush who has sent huge amounts of US aid to Africa. Course that doesn't get any play because why, oh yeah, it doesn't bash Bush.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com