This blog printed on 100% recycled electrons.
...or at least like Martin Luther King and Bill Clinton, which should close enough.
Dr. Mankiw directs my attention to a diverting little study by Dartmouth professors Bruce Sacerdote and Owen Zidar on our presidential candidates' word choices (PDF alert!). The curious professors analyzed word frequencies in the speeches of Huckabee, McCain, Romney, Thompson, Giuliani, Clinton, Obama, and Edwards and compared them with word frequencies in the speeches of Reagan, ML King, LBJ, Bill Clinton, GW Bush, JFK, and Stalin.
On a scale comparing candidate speeches to the words of Reagan and King, ranging from 0 for Reaganesque speech and 1 for Kingly speech, Huckabee scored a 1.466, highest of all the candidates, even higher than Obama (1.051) and Clinton (0.751).
Shift the scale of comparison to LBJ (0) vs. Bill Clinton (1), and Huckabee sounds much more like his fellow Arkansian, scoring 0.993, second only to Hillary (whose 1.743 points to the obvious conclusion: same speech writers!).
Most startling and amusing: on a scale of comparison to Stalin (0) vs. JFK (1), Huckabee ranks way down in old-school Red territory with a score of negative 0.587. (Don't chuckle too loudly, grieving supporters of Thompson: old Fred sounded pretty Stalinist too, scoring 0.007).
I've been bemused by the steady drone of anti-Huckabee propaganda posted by some who think a Southern Baptist preacher poses the greatest threat to the Christian worldview (or maybe just the party of evangelical plutocracy) since Nero. But now I see the Huckabee-haters can back up their claims with some good old secular humanist science.
Enjoy, Bob -- think of it as an early Groundhog Day present.
Just a couple more interesting notes from the study: Giuliani, that liberal sheep in GOP wolf's clothing also scores closer to King, Bill Clinton, and Stalin in Sacerdote and Zidal's analysis. But churchgoers and unconstitutional religious testers, take note; in placing candidates on the Reagan-King scale, the researchers found that Obama uses the word "god's" twice as often as McCain and almost four times as often as Hillary Clinton. Obama also uses the word "church" more than twice as often as HRC and twelve times more frequently than McCain.
I think I hear Todd humming, "Oh come, all ye faithful...."
For more number fun, read the whole study here.
Drinking Liberally Update (11/15/2024)
-
In Politics: Nationally: The Election is over and the wrong side won. I
have nothing to contribute to the barrels of ink being used by Pundits to
explain a...
3 days ago
I don't put a whole lot of stock in what a candidate says, especially on the campaign trail.
ReplyDeleteIt doesn't matter whether their talk involves lofty language, negative language, etc. What they say on the campaign trail isn't worth gum on the bottom of your shoe if it doesn't line up with how they've legislated and governed in the past.
For instance, Huckabee governed like a liberal on illegal immigration, but now he's trying to sound like Tom Tancredo.
Anyone who believes what a candidate says on the campaign trail, when it is different than their track record and especially when they haven't said they were wrong before (at least Romney did that), is laughably gullible.
Huckabee may be the best of the worst (all that's left) in the Republican field, but that doesn't change the fact that he's a pro-life liberal.
Republicans ought to be about fixing the damage liberals have done to our great country, not simply going slower in leading us to ruin.
It doesn't matter HOW MANY TIMES MIKE HUCK(STER)BEE said ANY English word.
ReplyDeleteIfn' he don't know what a 40% sales tax is an Open Invitation to a Black Market, Well, Damn, He don' remember PROHIBITION!!!!!
In which case, he is laying hisself open to the rise of the KENNEDIES & all that is LIBERAL in America!!!!
Consumption tax. WHAT A CHUMP