We've moved!
DakotaFreePress.com!

Social Icons

twitterfacebooklinkedinrss feed

Tuesday, August 5, 2008

High Oil Prices Good for America, Environment

"Drill here, drill now"? Ha! Try "Build here, build now." The New York Times runs a highly informative article that describes how high energy prices are boosting American manufacturing, with the pleasant side benefits of helping the environment and (shout-out to my Sibby-peeps!) checking globalization.

How on Earth can $120/barrel oil be good for us?

  • Tesla Motors planned to build battery packs for its new electric cars in Thailand, install them in Britain, and ship them to the U.S. This spring Tesla decided to save on shipping costs by building the batteries and cars together in California.
  • "To avoid having to ship all its products from abroad, the Swedish furniture manufacturer Ikea opened its first factory in the United States in May."
  • "Some electronics companies that left Mexico in recent years for the lower wages in China are now returning to Mexico, because they can lower costs by trucking their output overland to American consumers."
  • "China’s steel exports to the United States are now tumbling by more than 20 percent on a year-over-year basis, their worst performance in a decade, while American steel production has been rising after years of decline."
  • "[M]ore wood is now going to traditional domestic furniture-making centers in North Carolina and Virginia, where the industry had all but been wiped out."
  • Low shipping costs made it feasible for global corporations to shift production to far-flung countries with crummy environmental regulations. Increased transportation costs mean more companies will find it just as cost-effective to stay in the U.S. and obey environmental regulations as to truck their goods back and forth across the Pacific just to get away from green requirements.
  • For those of you really opposed to global free trade: a May study by Canadian investment bank CIBC World Markets "calculates that the recent surge in shipping costs is on average the equivalent of a 9 percent tariff on trade. 'The cost of moving goods, not the cost of tariffs, is the largest barrier to global trade today,' the report concluded, and as a result 'has effectively offset all the trade liberalization efforts of the last three decades.'”
[All quotes from Larry Rohter, "Shipping Costs Start to Crimp Globalization," New York Times, 2008.08.03.]

But heads up: Rohter warns that if domestic production is about to become the new orange in global economics, the U.S. has some catching up to do. In the race to globalization, we've shed a lot of our manufacturing capacity and know-how. Even if corporations want to bring manufacturing back closer to home, they may have a tough time finding enough skilled manufacturing workers to do the jobs. Get ready for a surge, vo-techs!

5 comments:

  1. Stuff still needs to be shipped right? They haven't made an electric car with enough horsepower to pull a trailer much less a full load!
    The real problem is you take away everything that is made from oil and your cooking over an open-fire in your sod covered house. That might be a dream for you. But I don't try and take away your dreams to make mine come true!
    Go through your home and remove all of your plastics, rubber products, insulation and sealants.
    You can't product the same products with soy and gum arabic.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Correction - You can't produce the same products with soy and gum arabic.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This might be good for bringing manufacturing jobs back, I don't know. But how does it help the poor who are struggling to get by paying for necessary higher gas for their cars to get to jobs etc, and the resultant higher prices of absolutely everything else because literally everything that we use has to be shipped from somewhere?

    We are not going to get off oil in the near future, it's a given. We need to be drilling to make ourselves energy self-sufficient, while at the same time expanding other options. It does not have to be one or the other; it takes both. The people get it. The Dems don't!

    I'm with anonymous above. No one is going to return to living like we did 100 years or more ago. We need to drill now, drill here (and if you, Cory, consider this is sexual, you need help!). Conservation, using our own God-given resources, and developing new sources of energy are all necessary for the future of our country and maybe even for the future of life as we know it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The simple answer to our energy independance is take over Kuwait and Saudi Arabi...once the are secured then we can seize Venezuala after that seize Libya... and last but not least Iran...after we secure our glorious empire then we will have all of the oil we will need for generations.......and a nice empire for us to boot...bush has shown us the way for us to build our new empire....why would we want to ever drill of our own coast?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Such a cluster of ideas the anonymous have...

    As an aside:
    The cost of shipping products does make local production more attractive. But only in a capitalist system that allows free enterprise and individual ownership. The more governmental control there is, the less likely such adaptions will occur. Particularly when government bails out the failures.

    But on the main point what is neglected in the wishy-washy logic of those that love higher fuel costs is that the cost of producing those goods, like electronics and steel, is still much higher made locally now than they were before in a foreign country. That means higher cost to every consumer an economy suffering on every front. Local production is a silver lining in the storm of the century.

    At least there will be wind for those turbines :)

    ReplyDelete

Comments are closed, as this portion of the Madville Times is in archive mode. You can join the discussion of current issues at MadvilleTimes.com.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.