Sioux Falls is still 12.5% below the national average crime rates. Here's a comparison with some other metros within a day's drive:
| City | Rank | Score (% above or below nat'l crime rate) |
| Madison (WI) | 99 | –31.0 |
| Cedar Rapids | 123 | –20.0 |
| Lincoln | 134 | –13.1 |
| Sioux Falls | 136 | –12.5 |
| Sioux City | 140 | –12.1 |
| Fargo | 149 | –7.8 |
| Davenport | 221 | 31.2 |
| Des Moines | 236 | 37.0 |
| Omaha | 239 | 38.8 |
| St. Paul | 298 | 74.7 |
| Minneapolis | 353 | 127.5 |
| Kansas City | 380 | 186.01 |
And now for your daily paradigm-buster: Remember last year when Senator Thune made some silly comment about how Central Park would be safer with some gun-toting Sioux Falls tourists to keep the peace? Golly, they must have gone there: New York City is ranked 132nd safest, better than Sioux Falls at 14.5% below the national crime rate average. Go figure!






This blog printed on 100% recycled electrons.


No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are closed, as this portion of the Madville Times is in archive mode. You can join the discussion of current issues at MadvilleTimes.com.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.