Madville Times Readers Want Primary Challenge to Herseth Sandlin

The most recent Madville Times asked you, dear readers, "Would you like to see a Democrat challenge Herseth in the primary?" 108 of you took time to tell us all what you think (thank you!). The results: we want a rumble!

Yes: Replace SHS with a real Dem!	42 (38%)
Yes: SHS will win, but she needs a challenge.	24 (22%)
Yes: Dem primary helps GOP!	9 (8%)
No: SHS is the best!	12 (11%)
No: SHS will win; why bother?	15 (13%)
No: Dem primary helps GOP!	6 (5%)

68% of you would like to see some brave Dem find his or her inner Wellstone (or Wasson?) and challenge the status quo. Only a handful of those respondents indicated they were Republicans chomping at the bit for a Dem bloodbath.

The number I'd worry about if I were sitting in 331 Cannon or the Sioux Falls office: only 11% of respondents on this Democrat-leaning blog rejected a primary on the basis of SHS being "the best."

Opportunity is knocking, young rising Dems! The incumbent is weak, voters want a discussion, and there's a new open primary offering the chance to draw Dems and Independents to your cause. Now's the perfect time to jump in and lead the conversation!

South Dakota Democrats Choose Open Primary

Former Presidential Press Secretary Ari Fleischer says the Bush White House was "welcoming and open-minded" (but Fleischer has also said AG Holder's torture investigations are "disgusting," so what does he know?).

Meanwhile, the South Dakota Democratic Party is showing how welcoming and open-minded it can be in public: At yesterday's state central committee meeting in Chamberlain, the Dems approved opening the party's primary elections to independents.

So, want to see a test of who the moderate centrists are in this state? Watch the primaries. We Dems are opening the door for folks who don't care to associate with a particular party label to participate in one more level of choosing their public officials. Almost inevitably, that means in a fair primary fight between a moderate, centrist Democrat (like, oh, say, Scott Heidepriem) and a good fire-breathing Wellstone-Kucinich Democrat that would win a leftist Madville Times endorsement (like, oh, say, Ron Volesky—go, Ron!), the centrist will have an advantage.

And South Dakota Democrats are saying, "We can work with that." We'll welcome independents at our primary debates. We'll be open to their participation in choosing our candidates. We'll surrender a little bit of power of picking candidates in-house in favor of involving more people in the political process. And in return, maybe, just maybe, we'll see some independents make the early buy-in and stick with our candidates in the general election.

Do you think South Dakota's Republicans will follow suit? Do you think they should?