We've moved!
DakotaFreePress.com!

Social Icons

twitterfacebooklinkedinrss feed
Showing posts with label Elk Point. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Elk Point. Show all posts

Thursday, December 16, 2010

Hyperion Can't Count, Lowballs Pollution by Half

I hear on SDPB and read on KELO this morning that Hyperion was a little off in its pollution estimates on its proposed Elk Point refinery when it applied for a South Dakota air quality permit. By half:

Hyperion Resources has informed the state that a proposed oil refinery in southeast South Dakota would release almost double the amount of greenhouse gases previously estimated.

Documents from the Department of Environment and Natural Resources show that previous estimates omitted a step in the refining process ["Proposed SD Refinery's Emissions Revised," AP via KELO, 2010.12.16].

Emissions revised?!?! I'd ask what you guys are smoking, but you'd probably miss that by half as well.

But I guess when you've never built, let alone run, an oil refinery before, it's easy to miss a step in the process, right? But golly gee, what steps would you omit when you actually start building the thing? What safety steps would you omit when you fire that sucker up and start belching pollution into our clean prairie air and fresh water supply?

Department of Environment and Natural Resources, tell me you aren't taking these Hyperion incompetents seriously any more. Please. Hyperion can't even report its own projected pollution correctly, let alone build and operate a safe and clean refinery. Throw their permit out.

Friday, January 29, 2010

Clay Rural Water Says No to Hyperion

I went to bed last night with an extra spring in my snore: Rebecca Terk of Flying Tomato Farms had just broken the news that Clay Rural Water System voted unanimously to reject Hyperion's request that CRWS supply up to 12 million gallons of water per day to Hyperion's proposed oil refinery near Elk Point. Supplying Hyperion would have required CRWS to tentuple its current 1.2 million gallon/day capacity. The dealbreaker, however, was Hyperion's Wimpy request that CRWS pay for the new water infrastructure today, with the promise that Hyperion would pay them back several Tuesdays from now.

Clay Rural Water's vote is an encouraging sign that not all South Dakotans can be driven to crazy, unsustainable actions by the wild promises of Big Oil. But it does not leave Hyperion high and dry. CRWS's nay may actually be just what Hyperion wanted. Hyperion didn't bother to send a rep to last night's meeting. The company actually provided CRWS with a model "Form of Intent Not to Serve"—when a corporation pays its lawyers to take time to write up a legal document for you, beware.

The denial statement, adopted by the CRWS board, says CRWS consents to Hyperion seeking water from other suppliers. This negates the possibility that CRWS could use federal regs to stop other suppliers from seeking Hyperion's water business. It could well be that Hyperion knew all along that CRWS lacked the resources to become a heavy industrial water supplier and just wanted to play a little CYA before it went seeking a biger aquifer-draining supplier.

But for now, Clay Rural Water customers can be happy that they won't experience a sudden drop in pressure in the shower if the Hyperion refinery ever fires up.

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Clay Rural Water Considers Hyperion Water Request Tonight

Thirsty? Hyperion is. They are asking Clay Rural Water Systems to agree to provide 10–12 million gallons of water per day to their proposed oil refinery near Elk Point.

The intrepid Rebecca Terk of Flying Tomato Farms reminds us that Clay Rural Water meets tonight, Thursday, Jan. 28, at 7:30 p.m. She gives directions (30376 SD Hwy 19, 11 miles north of Vermillion) and offers to arrange rides to this really important public meeting.

Why is this meeting important? Terk notes that CRWS has six reservoirs with a total capacity of 1.04 million gallons. Hyperion could drain those reservoirs before morning coffee and still be thirsty for more.

So if you're thirsty... or if you just want to keep your taps running in Clay and Union County, you might want to drop by the Clay Rural Water meeting tonight and ask the directors how they plan to water a big slurping oil refinery and their current customers.

Monday, January 4, 2010

SD Media on Hyperion: Corporate Line Always Comes First

Mr. Epp reacts the same way I did to that Sioux Falls paper's headlining of some pro-Hyperion propaganda over the weekend. Hoping that most readers pay attention to only the first couple paragraphs, the mainstream media puts the corporate line at the top and shoves below the fold the copious evidence that Hyperion doesn't have a realistic chance of building its proposed Elk Point refinery.

But even below the fold, it's nice that the paid South Dakota press is catching up with what the South Dakota blogosphere has been pointing out for over a year: market fundamentals say Hyperion won't happen.

----------------------------
Update 2010.01.05 10:06 CST:
Cranky old Doug Maurstad picks up the theme with a good rundown of all the factors standing between Hyperion and a chance in heck of making their plans reality.

Saturday, December 26, 2009

Hyperion Won't Happen, Now or After Recession

AP offers yet another story about American oil refineries scaling back and closing. Does anyone still believe Hyperion's bluff that they're going to build an expensive new refinery here in South Dakota?

But wait: maybe it's just the recession causing a temporary dip in petro-demand. Once President Obama fixes the economy, we'll need more gasoline than ever, right?

Just a few years ago, gas was $4 a gallon and there were worries the nation did not have enough refining capacity. But the recession, coupled with more emphasis on fuel efficiency, has driven down demand as refineries were built and were expanded in China, India and the Middle East.

[Caris & Co. analyst Anne] Kohler said gasoline demand isn't likely to return to its 2007 peak and even if the economy turns around, refineries that are shuttered will probably stay closed, partly because it's so hard to reopen one once it's closed entirely [Geoff Mulvihill, "Refinery Struggles Bruise NJ Communities," AP via ABCNews.com, 2009.12.25].

No return to the 2007 peak. Sounds to me like the experts in the industry are saying oil refining is a dead-end investment.

Now those refineries have been offering great wages—$33 to $37 an hour, according to Mulvihill's report. I'd love to see Hyperion bring wages like that to Elk Point, but the oil industry sees wages like that as liabilities. Hyperion might bring a refinery here to take advantage of relatively cheaper labor—their own press promises average wages of $20 to $30 an hour, and you should always round company propaganda down. But the industry in general sees they can get even cheaper labor overseas and then ship the final product back to America.

Hm... can't export wind power jobs, can you?

Even the Sioux City Journal blog acknowledges that Hyperion would have to prove itself an exception to the market rules to make the Elk Point refinery a reality. I know folks in Elk Point need jobs, but Union County would do better to invest in achievable local industry rather than the pipe dreams of a company with no proven record and all the market fundamentals stacked against it.

Saturday, December 5, 2009

Less Gasoline, Less Oil Flowing, More Demand for Fuel Efficiency: Who Needs Hyperion?

Evidence continues to pile up that there is no viable business case for the proposed Hyperion oil refinery near Elk Point. My friends at the SD Tar Sands Pipeline blog note that demand for gasoline is dropping. SDTSP points to a Wall Street Journal report that Valero is closing a Delaware gasoline refinery. Experts in that article see gasoline demand decreasing or remaining flat as biofuels take more of the market and as motorists look for more fuel-efficient vehicles.

A new Department of Energy report says that last week, U.S. crude oil refineries operated at under 80% of capacity. The same report says our oil imports over the past month are down 13% from the same time last year. Domestic production is up, but there's still a net drop of 2.1% in cumulative oil input to refineries this year.

All this supports the case I've been making for the past year here (see also here and here and here): Hyperion's refinery proposal is more wishes and dreams than solid business case.

Thursday, September 3, 2009

Hey, Glenn Beck Club: Try Some Real Outrage... Over Hyperion and Gov. Rounds

My Google reader surprises me this afternoon by finally burping up a backlog of posts from Elk Point's Old Cranky, a South Dakotan with no good word to say about Hyperion or the Rounds Administration. In his latest post, he celebrates Hyperion's announcement that it is letting lapse half of the land options it holds in Union County. "6000 down and 6000 to go!"—I share Old Cranky's jubilation.

I also happily add his reasoning to the growing case that Hyperion will not build a refinery in Union County. One of his neighbors offers a very rational theory that buying up land options around Elk Point was just another ill-conceived business venture by Hyperion and its boss Al Huddleston. Hyperion can't build a refinery, but it gambles that maybe a real petro-player will buy the options from them to execute an actual project. The oil economy (and pipelines) go south, and Hyperion loses another bet. Brilliant!

More admirable is Old Cranky's genuine, concrete rage at the current South Dakota government that's been all hip-hip-hooray for this these pipe dreams. Unlike the Glenn Beck fan clubs that get their rage all tangled up in one entertainer's hyperbolic schtick and esoteric conspiracy theories, Old Cranky is ready to hold Governor Rounds and South Dakota's good old boys directly accountable for direct, demonstrable harm in our own backyards:

Governor Rounds... might have started this whole mess, but I’m here to tell you WE WILL FINISH IT! This isn’t over by a long shot, and when the last 6000 acres held hostage are released, then and only then will it start to be over. The worm is starting to turn and Hyperion is going to get bit right on their butt.

Never underestimate the power of the vote my friends. We will sweep them out of office and we will turn this government back to the people.

Somebody hand me a broom please.

I'll see you and your friends at the polls, Doug!

Up next: big essay and photo feature on TransCanada's Keystone pipeline, barreling through a family farm near you....

Friday, August 21, 2009

Oil in Elk Point or Wind in Howard: Pick Your Energy Future

Bob Ellis probably wants these environmentalist extremists in Howard to "take a hike", too:

Most of the talk about green job development has focused on urban areas, especially depressed, inner cities. But yesterday the conversation turned towards Rural America, and what’s already been accomplished there.

The conversation was initiated by Repower America, who held a press conference in Howard, SD to show their support for The American Clean Energy and Security Act. The organization believes the legislation could help bring 5,000 new jobs to South Dakota.

Because it is home to two wind energy companies, Howard (pop. 1071) was the perfect community to showcase this potential. Those two companies, Knight & Carver Wind Group and Energy Maintenance Service, offer good paying jobs that have helped diversify the town’s economy [Mike Knutson, "Green Jobs in Rural America," Reimagine Rural, 2009.08.21].


Conservatives like Bob Ellis cheer the potential construction of an oil refinery that will pollute the air, water, and land around Elk Point. I'm glad that Ellis can enjoy a little state affirmation of his worldview this morning, but that doesn't free us from the tarpit old-energy thinking that will only perpetuate our addiction to a dwindling resource.

Fortunately, some rural visionaries are looking for ways to change how we produce and use energy in hopes of creating real energy independence. The folks in Howard have been able to draw two energy businesses to town that have made actual progress toward producing domestic energy and jobs without big environmental impacts. Asking such visionaries to "take a hike" is the epitome of short-sightedness.

------------------------
p.s.: Have you noticed how the KELO graphic of the proposed Hyperion refinery is all smoky and brown? Think about it. (I wonder if Perry Groten chose that image....)

pp.s.: Another Hyperion, Hyperion Power Generation, and some other companies are looking at a possibly greener energy solution that oil refineries: micro-nukes! Hmm... would small nuclear reactors give us greener power... or just a nice green glow?

ppp.s.: Hat tip to eager reader Tony Amert: If we really want to break oil addiction, maybe we could fire up some nuclear reactors next to the ocean and make jet fuel out of seawater.

Monday, May 18, 2009

Hyperion Air Pollution Permit Hearing Starts Tuesday in Pierre

Don't forget: the South Dakota Board of Minerals and Environment holds four days of hearings this week, starting Tuesday, to determine whether to grant Hyperion permission to pollute the air around Elk Point with a new oil refinery. The hearings start at 10 a.m. Tuesday (with some smaller issues up first), then 9 a.m. Wed–Fri. Let's hope the BME will put environment over minerals on this one.

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Union County Losing Jobs: Hyperion Refinery Worth It?

Mr. Epp offers a worthwhile reminder that, for all of his good work covering (and questioning) Hyperion, he still goes back and forth on whether a big oil refinery would ultimately be a good thing for Elk Point. The April 2009 Rural Life Census Data Center newsletter from SDSU provides another reminder why the Hyperion refinery is not the black-and-white issue I often portray it as. For every good person who believes saving Union County means keeping Hyperion out, there are other good people who believe saving Union County means finding an employer who can bring back the almost 1,800 private-sector jobs Union County has lost since 2002. According to the RLCDC report (p. 2), Union County's private industry jobs dropped from 10,131 in 2002 to 8,344 in 2008. That's a 17.6% drop, the fifth largest in South Dakota.

(Custer County leads job losses over that period, losing 55.1% of its private-sector jobs. Where'd everybody go—Rapid City? But come on: even Butte, Meade, and Shannon showed double-digit percentage job growth. Weird!)

But the statistical picture is confusing. Don't forget that Union County includes golf-course-turned-municipality Dakota Dunes ("master planned community"—isn't that like the Soviet Union?). The county has still seen 10.9% population growth during this decade, and median household income is $56,951, 131% of the state median and the second highest in the state. So if all the jobs went to Vermillion and Sioux City, at least they appear to be pretty well-paying jobs... but enough to cover $4-a-gallon gas when it comes back for the daily commute?

It's complicated. Unlike Senator Thune, I believe we do need to think of indirect costs when we look at big policy questions, in this case, local economic development. If Union County has lost 1,800 jobs and they're trying to get them back, it does give me a little pause to look at them from three counties over and tell them they should turn down 1,800 permanent jobs and other indirect employment that the refinery could bring...

...assuming, as Mr. Epp reminds us, that Hyperion can even build a refinery, let along operate one in the black.

Friday, May 8, 2009

Blogs Rule! Media Dropping Ball on Hyperion Threat to Water, Wildlife, History

South Dakota Watch has struck a gusher of good information from its Union County citizen correspondent Carolyn Carlson. Last month, Carlson gave Mr. Epp a great scoop on how the proposed Hyperion refinery near Elk Point would dig up graves and virgin prairie. This week, Carlson unloads with more, telling us about her efforts to keep her rural water provider from getting snookered by Hyperion, the eagle habitat she's seen on the land Hyperion would Borg-ify, and the Lewis & Clark history the refinery could plow under.

Have you heard a word about this side of the story from any of the major Sioux Falls media? Maybe I've missed it (I have been a bit distracted by homework), but it seems our professional Fourth Estaters are going easy on the big corporation knocking on our door. The most recent Hyperion story I can find on KELO opens this way:

The proposed oil refinery near Elk Point is a multi-billion dollar project that would create thousands of jobs and bring millions of dollars in tax money to the state. Right now, that all hangs on a state air permit approval from the Board of Minerals and Environment [Ben Dunsmoor, "Gov. Picks Board Considering Hyperion Permit," KELOLand.com, 2009.04.16].

That story does go on to note the connection between Hyperion, Governor Rounds, and golf. A preceding story does note public opposition aired at the pollution permit hearings last month. But no mention of the potential harms Carlson and Epp have brought to our attention. The South Dakota professional press have also ignored the dinner dates Hyperion had with the air quality permit board, a story broken by Vermillion blogger Rebecca Terk and given coverage in the Sioux City press.

The geography and culture of Elk Point and Union County will be transformed forever if the Hyperion refinery becomes a reality. Our entire state would experience significant economic and environmental impacts. The Hyperion project deserves every iota of scrutiny we can give it. For our professional media to ignore the very significant information presented by Carolyn Carlson, whether to promote it or debunk it, is irresponsible.

I guess if we want something done right, we have to do it ourselves. Keep up the good work, Carolyn and Todd!

----
Update 15:15 CDT: And add to the Hyperion watch Alcester resident Doug Maurstad's blog, Old Cranky. He's been raising heck about Hyperion for a year online. Mr. Maurstad is also a big booster of alternative energy, specifically the Pickens Plan... and he quotes Samuel Adams. Keep speaking up, Doug!

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Hyperion and South Dakota Government: Maybe Not in Bed, But Having Dinner Together

Flying Tomato takes a break from the compost pile to get a strong whiff of horse manure from Hyperion and the South Dakota Board of Minerals and Environment. She's attending the public hearings on Hyperion's air pollution permit (continuing today in Elk Point, 9 a.m., high school gym). While lots of folks are speaking up to say the Hyperion deal stinks, our state officials are having dinner with the Hyperion lackeys (or wait—maybe the boys from Pierre are the lackeys). Keep an eye on Flying Tomato for more good firsthand coverage!

And Rebecca: Have fun storming the castle! :-)

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

Hyperion Can't Build Refineries, But Great at Newspeak

Hyperion has never built a refinery, but they sure can sell the snake oil. The recession is putting the brakes on all sorts of investment and big energy projects. Oil industry analyst Tom Kloza has said the chances of Hyperion getting its Elk Point project off the blueprints and into South Dakota's ground (and groundwater, and air) are "somewhere between slim and none."

So what does Hyperion say?? With the public hearing for their air pollution permit coming up April 15 and with KELO putting up a blip saying Hyperion's plans are a question mark, Hyperion trots out project executive Preston Phillips to manufacture the only thing he can: Hyperion's special brand of truth. Phillips tells KELO that Hyperion has more support for the refinery than last year—after all, you South Dakotans all want jobs, don't you?

Pure diversion. Hyperion could have all 400,000 workers in South Dakota submitting applications to work at their imaginary refinery, but that wouldn't have a thing to do with whether the refinery gets built. Hyperion needs investors, and of all the things today's nervous investors could sink their money into, a company that can hardly build landfills now trying to break into oil refining probably ranks somewhere around Citigroup and GM.

Hyperion's not dead, but their corporate propaganda shows they're on the defensive. The environmental permitting process gives us South Dakotans a great opportunity to tell Hyperion and our state government that we have better ideas for South Dakota's and America's energy future than some Texas speculators trying to cash in on their fantasies about being big players in a dying industry.

Monday, November 10, 2008

Hyperion Requests DENR Ease Air, Water Quality Requirements

Thom Gabrukiewicz reports in Saturday's Sioux Falls paper that Hyperion is "vigorously opposed" to installing the air quality equipment South Dakota's Department of Environment and Natural Resources has recommended for its proposed Elk Point refinery. DENR evidently wants Hyperion to use closed-vent systems and thermal oxidizers to control vapor emissions from 100+ storage tanks. Calling such a requirement "unprecendented," Hyperion says that approach would "result in unacceptable, adverse economic and environmental impacts."

You can read the full rebuttal in project manager Colin Campbell's October 27, 2008, letter [PDF alert!] to DENR's Brian Gustafson on the DENR website. Two arguments stand out:
  • Hyperion says their proposed emissions control technology, internal floating roofs, is more cost-effective in allowing more flexible refinery operations.
  • Hyperion says internal foating roofs are a better solution because they have no moving parts and consume no energy, while the oxidizers use energy and emit more pollutants due to combustion (see Enclosure B, page 3).
Interesting—engineers, does Hyperion have a point?

Hyperion is also resisting some stringent water quality requirements. DENR wants Hyperion to collect and test hourly wastewater samples for benzene concentration. Hyperion finds that requirement "excessive and unwarranted" and argues in favor of monthly water samples, in accordance with federal regulations (see Enclosure A, page 1, item 8).

Hyperion also points out a number of "errors" in the DENR's math... significantly more of which show DENR calculating emissions limits that are lower that what Hyperion says the formulas should produce. Interesting: I hope we can get some good independent checking of everybody's math!

Friday, October 24, 2008

Hyperion's Big Slurp: Rural Water Customers Not Impressed

Flying Tomato swaps her garden bibbers for some local politics, offering fine coverage of the big Clay Rural Water System meeting last night in Vermillion. Forty citizens in attendance at a rural water meeting? Yeah, I'd call that big.

Those good citizens came to town to discuss with the Clay Rural Water board Hyperion's request for water service for its proposed refinery near Elk Point. I've heard Hyperion wants 9 to 12 million gallons a day; Flying Tomato reports Hyperion may need up to 15 million gallons a day. Fourteen Clay Water customers spoke last night, and their opposition to granting Hyperion this big slurp was unanimous.

And in response to this public input, the Clay Rural Water board voted 5–3 in favor of "investigating further" whether they should take on Hyperion's water demand. Funny: when I've conducted a public meeting and heard unanimous opposition from constituents, I've voted to drop the issue right then and there, not "investigate further." And in the case of Clay Rural Water, the constituents are paying customers. What ever happened to business listening to consumer demand?

Oh yeah—I guess when the out-of-state gorilla in the room is asking to buy six to ten times as much product as everyone else combined, the loyal local customers find their voices just don't matter as much.

Flying Tomato does give the board some credit: she indicates the board at least recognizes the consensus among its current members. Let's hope the board looks beyond Hyperion's "airy promises of jobs, development, and MONEY" and looks at its water as something to protect for future generations. Saving water for future population growth is a much healthier, safer, more stable basis for economic growth than a single massive investment in a dying energy industry.

---------------
Update
15:45: Flying Tomato offers more on oil and water not mixing. She notes that Clay Rural Water was founded as a happy little non-profit, community-based project, there to provide a service for neighbors and members, not make money. And it's worked for 30 years. Say it softly (Flying Tomato does!): socialism....

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Hyperion Drinks Your Milkshake... and 9 Million Gallons of Water

Daniel Plainview would be proud....

An eager reader points to a note in today's edition of that Sioux Falls paper on an upcoming meeting of the Clay Rural Water System. This Thursday at 7:30 p.m. at Vermillion's 4-H Center (515 High Street), the water system's board of directors discuss a request from Hyperion Resources to supply water for the proposed refinery at Elk Point.

Clay Rural Water currently supplies 1.3 million gallons of water a day to a little over 2000 locations in southeastern South Dakota. Hyperion is requesting a daily supply of 9 to 12 million gallons of water.

Perspective: my wife, my daughter, and I consume about 3000 gallons of water a month from Kingbrook Rural Water. Call it a hundred gallons a day (dang—even that seems like a lot of water!). The water Hyperion is requesting would be enough to meet the needs of 90,000 to 120,000 households like mine. That's another Sioux Falls and then some.

Some communities in the Sioux Falls metroplex are already scrambling to find enough water to support their population growth. The Hyperion refinery would take at least another 90,000 households worth of water off the growth table.

So if you had to choose, which economic development route would you pursue: one refinery that will generate a couple thousand jobs, or 90,000 new households filled with moms, dads and kids to generate jobs and wealth in southeast South Dakota? (And remember: you can't drink oil, no matter how green it is.)

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

CNN Questions Hyperion's Cash, Commitment

A close observer of Elk Point affairs points me toward a seven-minute report by CNN's Drew Griffin on Hyperion's plans to build a refinery in Elk Point. (I love it when South Dakota makes the national news and the reporter manages not to confuse us with North Dakota.) The report casts Hyperion as a secretive, arguably shady company that lacks the experience and quite possibly the capital to build an oil refinery.

Among the oddities in Hyperion's behavior, Griffin shows Hyperion's shiny Elk Point office, where the reporter was told no one was available to answer his questions. The actual Hyperion people come maybe every couple weeks. The receptionist provides one of the richest soundbites of the report: "They golfed last week at the governor's tournament, but they're not here otherwise."

In Dallas, the company wouldn't give an interview at its headquarters and instead required that an interview with spokesman Preston Phillips be held at a public park six miles from Hyperion's main office. (Hyperion must be really committed to having trees in the background for its interviews to ask a reporter to conduct an interview outside in Dallas on a summer day rather than in the air-conditioned comfort of an office.)

More substantially, Griffin notes that Hyperion's experience is mostly in real estate and oil and gas leases, not actually building anything. Griffin also mentions Milo Vranac's lawsuit against Hyperion CEO Albert Huddleston (but wait, no hat tip from CNN to Todd Epp for his good reporting on the lawsuit? come on, Drew, where's the love?). Believing Hyperion can build a ten-billion-dollar clean oil refinery in six years requires a leap of faith perhaps beyond typical capitalist risk-taking.

CNN's Griffin invites Huddleston to give his side, but Huddleston won't come to the park to chat in person or answer questions directly. Instead, Hyperion provides a video of Huddleston holding forth on energy, history, and other topics of his choice (and again, in front of a backdrop of nice green trees—yes, they meant to do that). On actually getting the money to make the refinery happen, Huddleston only says he won't go to his "strategic partners" until Hyperion gets the permits for the refinery.

Huddleston evidently is willing to talk finances with Elk Point Mayor Isabel Trobaugh, who says Huddleston has told her personally that Hyperion has the money. Mayor Trobaugh also says of course the refinery will be good for Elk Point, since "If we don't grow, a small city dies."

Elk Point farmer Dale Harkness thinks clean water and air might be more important for a small city than a refinery. From his corn field and his front porch (and that's a heck of a front porch, Dale!), Harkness looks beyond his fence line and his lifetime to make the following calm yet firm declaration:

I'll keep fighting it. They'll never build here. 150 years from now, somebody will be enjoying that land and this land.

Now that's looking to the future. You'll never hear Hyperion or any other corporation talking about 150 years from now. Foresight is as important as finances in working toward a sustainable future. Maybe Huddleston should invite Harkness along on his next golf outing with the governor. He might learn a thing or two.

Tuesday, June 3, 2008

Elk Point-Hyperion News at Sioux City Journal

As the Democratic nomination appears to be heading toward a conclusion regardless of the results in South Dakota, it may turn out that the most significant vote taking place today in South Dakota has just wrapped up in Union County. The Sioux City Journal's Dave Dreeszen and Michelle Linck are offering great blog coverage of the vote on rezoning for the proposed Hyperion refinery. Polls are closed; keep an eye out for results soon. Linck reports sizable turnout so far -- 57% in North Sioux City alone.

Monday, May 19, 2008

Hyperion Refinery? No Way! 26 Reasons

Kelsey at Dakota Women turns a well-deserved spotlight on "From Z to A," where Union County native Karen Eidem lists 26 darn good reasons for her parents and other Union County voters to say no to the Hyperion refinery in the election June 3. Here's just a sample of Karen's arguments:

Young people

On May 5, the Sioux City Journal reported that many Young People will consider leaving the area if the refinery is built. Of Young people aged 18-24 years, 38% said they would consider moving if a refinery is built. Of Young people aged 25-34, 29% would consider moving....

Oil

Oil is not progressive. We know (and have known for a long time) that we have limited amounts of Oil -- it is a non-renewable fossil fuel....

VIABLE ENERGY OPTIONS EXIST to heat and cool our homes and businesses, to create products, and -- yes -- even to run our cars. But we as consumers need to demand it; we do not need to propogate a 20th century way of thinking and consuming....

Gas Prices

It is all over the news and you feel it every time you fill up -- Gas prices are high. But this particular refinery will not ensure they will go down:

1) The dirty, heavy crude from the Tar Sands is extremely difficult and costly to refine. In fact, the only reason oil companies are pursuing this oil right now is because Gas prices are high; otherwise, it is not worth the cost of investment. Therefore, oil companies need Gas prices to stay high in order to make a profit from Tar Sands crude and it would be better for their profit margins if gas prices go higher.

2) On April 24th on South Dakota Public Television, Hyperion said that there is no guarantee that anyone in South Dakota will be using the Gas they produce. In fact, the only way South Dakota will get the Gas is if the state offers the best contract at the best price.

3) To add insult to injury, many areas near refineries have an extra Gas tax to offset auxillary costs of a refinery. That's what happens elsewhere; will it happen here? [Karen Eidem, "From Z to A: 26 Reasons to Vote No June 3," May 2008]


Still think a refinery is going to save us money at the pump? Think again...

There's much much more at From Z to A, which I highly recommend. Good arguments, lots of links so you can do your own reading, and even colorful yet tasteful typography! And Karen provides her e-mail address, so she's not afraid to put her name to her words and talk to you about the issue. Good work, Karen!

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Lawsuit Against Hyperion CEO Huddleston Makes Sioux City Paper

Dave Dreeszen of the Sioux City Journal gives the lawsuit against Hyperion CEO Albert Huddleston and his wife Mary some welcome mainstream media attention:

Trustees for the Hunt family trust denied a request from Albert Huddleston and his wife, Mary, to spend trust funds on a proposed oil refinery in Union County, S.D., a lawyer for one of the trustees said Tuesday.

The trustee, Miro Vranac Jr., thought it was a "dumb idea,'' to use the funds for such a speculative project, said Vranac's attorney, Bill Brewer of Dallas.

"Mr. Vranac's take on it was it was not the type of operation the trust should be investing in,'' Brewer said [Dave Dreeszen, "Lawsuit: Hyperion CEO, Wife Misused Trust Funds," Sioux City Journal, 2008.05.14].

I'd be curious to hear Vranac's opinion of using federal funds to guarantee loans for such a speculative project.

Unless I've missed something, still not a whisper of the story from the big South Dakota media, just the blogs.

Update 13:49 CDT: Gripe and ye shall receive: that Sioux Falls paper posts Dreeszen's report on the Huddleston lawsuit, as of 45 minutes ago.