Now if you Google this study, you can find a stern critique of Hoen et al.'s preliminary work on the Industrial Wind Action website. It is important to note that IWA based its criticism on preliminary conclusions the authors circulated in 2007. IWA posted this criticism of Hoen et al.'s draft work in September, prior to publication of the final study. The authors include IWA's Lisa Linowes in their acknowledgments at the beginning of the published study, which suggests they did indeed take into consideration IWA's complaints about methodology in drafting their final report.
Interestingly, you can also find this newsblip from CBS affiliate KOSA in West Texas, in which reporter Greg Sherman appears to get the story flat wrong. I've e-mailed him to ask if he is citing a different Department of Energy study (why is it so hard for professional reporters to figure out how to cite sources and provide hyperlinks?). Still no reply... and no correction.
As the authors themselves acknowledge, these results doesn't change the fact that some folks don't like windmills, and that some folks may refuse to bid as high on a house near a windmill. But the science says that overall, you can't argue that a wind farm will drive down your property values.
Read more:
- Summaries in the New York Times, USA Today, and Business Green.
- The spin doctors at Investor's Business Daily cite "critics" who think "common sense" trumps actual evidence. So does columnist Chris Savula, who says we should ignore the DoE study and believe what we want. Denialism, anyone?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are closed, as this portion of the Madville Times is in archive mode. You can join the discussion of current issues at MadvilleTimes.com.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.