We've moved!
DakotaFreePress.com!

Social Icons

twitterfacebooklinkedinrss feed
Showing posts with label trimesters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label trimesters. Show all posts

Thursday, May 14, 2009

Goodbye Trimesters... and Goodbye Classroom Contact Time?

Madison High School is ending its decade-plus-long experiment in trimester scheduling. In the 2010-2011 academic year, my alma mater will adopt a semester block schedule. Short form: each day will have four 90-minute class periods. Classes alternate day by day: Monday, a freshman might take English, Algebra, Art, and Band, then Tuesday, that student might have Science, Wood Shop, P.E., and Study Hall, and back and forth from there.

Getting rid of trimesters is good. Semesters align better with other schools in district and out. Students can transfer more easily. Students taking year-long classes like Geometry and Biology won't have that bothersome gap where they take the first half during first trimester, then wait until third tri to take the second half. And an 18-week semester gives teachers more time to cover material than a 12-week trimester...

...or will it? I certainly felt more rushed teaching in Madison's trimester system than I did in Montrose's traditional semester system. One day at Madison, I broke down the contact time available in the trimester system and found trimesters gave us 180 minutes less contact time with students. But as I recall and update that chart, I find the new semester block system will not reverse but continue this trend of decreasing contact time:


Semester Trimester Block
Weeks 18 12 18
Minutes per class period 50 72 90
Class meetings 90 60 45
Total contact time (minutes) 4500 4320 4050

The trimester system reduced contact time between teachers and students by 180 minutes, more than three and a half class semester-size class periods. The block system only makes that gap worse: Kids who take algebra at MHS will have 450 minutes less contact time with their teacher than kids who take algebra at a school with a semester system. That's like missing nine days out of a regular semester (and at Montrose, I think missing ten days a semester meant you flunked). Sure, kids can squeeze in an eighth class each semester, but they trade off almost two weeks from every other class to get it.

Now we could argue that what we lose in contact time, we make up for in the quality of longer meetings. For instance, as Principal Knowlton notes in Tuesday's MDL, students in the health science classes will be able to use the longer periods to do more work outside the classroom (I would assume that means visits to the hospital, nursing home, etc.).

And suppose that five minutes of every class period is lost to administration and getting going. (If you're really, really good, you can get class going immediately... but realistically, start-up take time.) Over an entire semester of daily 50-minute classes, you lose 450 minutes of instructional time. Under block, meeting 90-minutes every other day, you lose "only" 225 minutes.

But block also sacrifices that daily contact with students. There's something to be said for being able to monitor students' progress every day. There are also some activities that work better in small doses every day. For example, when I taught English, I did weekly vocabulary lessons. Monday, I'd hand out the list. Tuesday we'd go over definitions. Wednesday we'd do one worksheet. Thursday we'd do a second worksheet. Friday we'd have the quiz. Each day, 5–10 minutes, quick repetition to make the words stick, and then off to the next activity. If I spread those same daily lessons out over a block schedule, each vocab lesson would take two weeks, and we'd only cover half as much vocab. If I cram those activities into two or three meetings a week, the kids get less repetition and possibly less retention of the new words.

I think math teachers can make a similar argument. On some math topics, kids need to learn and drill just one specific topic for a day before moving on. Some days, it's nice to just give a test, let the kids concentrate, and wait until the next day to start something new. The trimester pressures teachers to do a couple lessons a day, or to give a test during the first part of class and then cover new material during the last part. The block schedule will only increase this pressure.

The block schedule has its advantages, and it seems to be an improvement over our wacky trimesters. Block done right may even be good for the music program. But I'm still not convinced we've found an improvement over good old semesters. We'll see what the teachers and kids think in 2010.

More reading:

Monday, June 9, 2008

Madison Axes Trimesters

Word comes from tonight's Madison Central School Board meeting that the district will return to a semester system by fall 2009. The recommendation from the trimester committee* (which is now linked on tonight's agenda page): "Create a new semester scheduling model that honors benefits of current service and practice while opening opportunities for the future needs of children in our region." (I have a bad feeling the trimester committee might have had to spend one full meeting of its three unpublicized meetings -- April 8, April 22, and May 5 -- just coming up with the wording for that rather ungainly statement.)

Whatever the "benefits of current service and practice" might be, they weren't enough (reports my source) to outweigh problems with transferring credits, aligning schedules within the district and with other schools, and, apparently, some academic achievement concerns.

So check your schedules, freshmen: you might have to refigure how to get your credits in after the change.

A question of great import to students: when the school district switched to trimesters, it also eliminated study halls. Will the high school be bringing back that time-honored tradition as well?

*You can see the names of the committee in the PDF document finally provided by the district, or you can save the download time and read them here:

Committee Members:
Dr. Ralph Wagoner: Facilitator
Margaret Sumption: Consultant
Vince Schaefer: Superintendent
Craig Walker: School Board Member
Sharon Knowlton: MHS Principal
Cotton Koch: Madison Middle School Principal/Parent
Mike Ricke: Middle School Teacher
Holly Renken: Middle School Teacher
Jenn Richards: MHS/MS Teacher
Luke Sursely: MHS/MS Teacher
Kristi Olson: MHS Teacher/Parent
Dawn Wiebers: MHS Teacher
Diana Larson: MHS Counselor
Renae Roeman: Parent
Dennis Zingmark: Parent
Kathy Engbrecht: Parent

Sunday, June 8, 2008

Sunday Morning Pot Stirrers: School Board, Trimesters, County Land Sale

Just wondering:

School Board Third Seat: Who Wants the Job?

The deadline for applying for the open Madison Central School Board seat is Monday (tomorrow!) at 4 p.m. Has anyone filed an application yet, or even thought about it? If you're thinking about it the forms are here in PDF and Word formats. Since this is a public office, I invite all applicants to send a copy of their applications to the Madville Times for the voters to see and compare.

The board has an executive session for "personnel matters" on the agenda (item #29) for tomorrow night's meeting -- expect a closed-door review of the applications and perhaps an appointment. Elected board members Jay Niedert and Tammy Jo Zingmark take office in July; if the board follows past precedent, the person they appoint will take the oath at the July meeting as well. Unless they hold a special meeting between now and then, tomorrow night's executive session is the only chance they'll have to discuss the appointment.

Trimester Review: Who Said What?

Also on the school board agenda Monday night is Principal Knowlton's presentation of the findings of the trimester review committee (item #12). Does anyone know who served on the committee, when they met, or what they discussed?

County Poor Farm: Bids, Anyone?

I noted yesterday that the county is putting nine acres of the old poor farm on Lake Madison back up for sale. The only interested bidder so far, wealthy Sioux Falls developer Ted Thoms, was too cheap to bite on the original opening price of $112,000, so we're trying again... at $100,000. Anyone out there thinking of bidding? How much do you think nine acres of Lake Madison property is worth? Maybe we should put the land on eBay, do an online auction. Submit your bids here! I'll pass them on the county.