We've moved!
DakotaFreePress.com!

Social Icons

twitterfacebooklinkedinrss feed
Showing posts with label family. Show all posts
Showing posts with label family. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Blogger Expands Culinary Horizons, Improves Dad Score

So I successfully defended my doctoral dissertation proposal yesterday. Big deal. Here's the biggest success of my day:
bear pancakeShe asked for pancakes. I had never made pancakes. (How does a guy go 39 years without making one of the easiest, most rewarding foods on the planet?) I remembered my Dad making pancakes. He made us bunnies, whales, all sorts of shapes. I broke out the cookbook, found the ingredients, and went to work. She told me I wasn't whisking properly, but a few minutes later, she joyfully received her bear pancake. (I was aiming for bunny. Ssshhhh!)
bear pancake
Sweet! Now watch out for that fork, honey bear.

And don't forget to eat those carrots.

Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Red-Blue Divide: Economic Realities Challenge Family Values

Thanks to our education and serious lifestyle choices, my wife and I have been able to enjoy giving our daughter what some might call a solid traditional upbringing, with both mom and dad home as much as possible to guide the child toward adulthood. In four and a half years, the Divine Miss K has had less than 12 hours of paid outsider babysitting, along with healthy doses of Grandma time. Otherwise, if our child comes out messed up, it's totally our fault.

If you didn't know us better, you might think Erin and I are traditional red-state family values voters: Dad as breadwinner, Mom mostly on stay-at-home patrol (and cooking really yummy meals). But a new book by legal scholars Naomi Cahn and June Carbone finds our values align pretty solidly with what they call "blue family" values: deferring marriage and childbirth to achieve some educational and economic gains first. "Red families," say Cahn and Carbone, see marriage and childbirth as the path to adulthood and thus encourage those activities sooner. Red families incline toward traditional gender roles as well.

Cahn and Carbone find that red families and the red states they fill with Republican/conservative votes have higher teen birth rates and higher divorce rates than blue families and blue Democrat/liberal states. What's happening here? Republican family values hypocrisy? Oh no—neocon fundies and us hippies alike are busting our chops to live up to our family values. It's just that the "red family system" doesn't fit our post-industrial economy:

Cahn: The red model of early marriage works really well if one breadwinner can support his family and where jobs are available and plentiful for high school grads. Unfortunately, that's not the economy we live in right now. In our economy, the more education you have, in most cases, the higher your income is going to be. It is hard to have a child and then provide the care you want and go to college to further your education. The red family model, while suited to particular times in the American economy and the American century, is not suited to needs of post-industrial economy that rewards investment in education and depends on two incomes as a way of family support.

...Cahn: The red family preaches breadwinner, and there is discontent when you want to be in the traditional breadwinner model and the economy won't allow that... In a red family, you might be working just at a minimum wage or you haven't had the time to further your education. Unfortunately you're less likely to be happy.

Carbone: The most recent studies show that couples who are less educated tend to have more traditional expectations about gender roles than college grads, but they also show that where the wife is working full-time and would prefer to have more time to spend with her children or in the home, she is very unhappy and more likely to divorce. The latest surveys show that couples who experience financial stress are more likely to divorce than they were a generation ago, and almost all twenty-something couples experience financial stress [emphases mine; Amy DePaul, "Why Do Red States Have the Worst 'Family Values'?" AlterNet, 2010.08.02].

As our esteemed SDSU philosophy prof David Nelson would have said, the higher levels of divorce among the traditional family values crowd is a hoop thing. Their worldview—their hoop—tells them that Dad ought to be able to go to work and make enough money to keep his family in pork chops and Sunday shoes, while Mom ought to be able to stay home and raise the kids right. Those values don't differ much from my wife's and mine. But in low-wage states like South Dakota, living those values is an enormous challenge. (78% of South Dakota kids younger than 6 have both parents working, the highest such percentage in the nation.) When your values tell you one thing and your wallet forces you to do something else, that's going to take a psychic toll. It busts your hoop... and maybe your family stability.

Cahn and Carbone cite Utah as a notable exception to the red-divorce trend. Utah has the lowest percentage of little kids with both parents working—just 52%. Cahn and Carbone say the shared religious commitment of Utahns provides more community support for putting family values into practice.

At the same time, Cahn and Carbone suggest that support for gay marriage may strengthen marriage and family values. Corrleation isn't causation, but consider: blue states tend to have more support for same-sex unions, and blue states have lower divorce rates. Hmm....

Just last week, I heard one of our county commissioners talk about creating a new position for a county zoning inspector. He said offering $30K for the job was reasonable, since there are plenty of other county employees working for that amount or less, and since we can find plenty of potential workers who can send their spouse out to work as well. When we build county staff and policy around the assumption that both spouses will work, we make it harder to attract people to our community who want to live out traditional family values and, as my wife and I manage, have at least parent around the house for Junior more often than not.

Granted, the county can't just double every employee's salary to allow every spouse to quit and head home. But when we talk about threats to family values, we need to spend less time looking for bogeymen we can "otherize" and demonize. Instead we "family values" advocates (aren't we all family values advocates?) should concentrate on changing the realities of the economic soup in which we all swim.

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Cousins, Not Friends™: Heidelberger Feud!

Excuse me while I cry myself to sleep. I got unfriended by my cousin Aaron (yeah, the one who wants to use old European economics to trigger a global depression) because of this Facebook exchange.

Aaron Heidelberger

Aaron Heidelberger We pay 700 Billion in interest every year (to china, japan and big banks) How much would it cost to save NASA? about 3 Billion per year. Hmmmm......just think what our country could do if they could save 700 billion a year in interest payments.

Cory Allen Heidelberger
Cory Allen Heidelberger
Wait -- you actually want us to do something a a country? NASA's just more socialism, isn't it?

Aaron Heidelberger
Aaron Heidelberger
Cory, My wife Comments on your blog on Kelo Land and you did not allow it? Sibby is banned from commenting on your blog. Why should I allow you to post your crap on my page?

Shamra Johnson
Shamra Johnson
Cory, your not welcome here. Don't you have better things to do like teaching your zombies how to properly march in missile parades.

Cory Allen Heidelberger
Cory Allen Heidelberger
Aaron, I don't spend hours managing the KELO comments. I sifted through the spam this weekend, approved the handful of actual comments. And the Madville Times is always open.

Shamra -- free country, right? And i'm not fond of missiles. I'm amazed at the absurd metaphors with which you color your imaginary world.

Cory Allen Heidelberger
Cory Allen Heidelberger
Oh, and I forgot: as usual, you forgot to answer the actual question. Instead, you go for the usual personal attacks and silly metaphors. That's why the 9-12 project and Tea Party will fail. It's why you did fail on health care. You are all slogan and insult and no real practical policy answers. Ouch!


Missile parades? I'm confused. Aaron's the one who brought up NASA. Sniffle.

Friday, November 27, 2009

My New Holiday Hat?

Quick holiday photo puzzle—what is that on my head?




New Russian hat?

Head-mounted battering ram for plowing through Black Frdiay shopping crowds?

Franken Mobile Satellite Uplink 2.0?

Nope. Something even more valuable:



Sometimes you're having so much fun, you don't notice your hat is covering your very funky sunglasses.

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Sandbox. Cemetery. Thunderstorm. Dads.

A personal story, with a nod toward the cosmic....

Yesterday I finished building a sandbox. (If my little one were old enough for sarcasm, she'd probably say, Just in time for summer to disappear. Thanks, Dad!) Every time I get outside and build—my carpentry isn't good enough for inside work—I think I could pitch academia and go into construction. Forget that dissertation; hand me a circular saw! When I'm building, my constructs are all real things. The only core theories I need are "Measure twice, cut once" and "When in doubt, ask Dad."

Seriously. My dad knows stuff. I don't think I've ever built anything, that sandbox included, without checking with him. Even when I boast to him, "I'm gonna build...," I'm really saying, "Am I doing this right?"

So I laid the last timber, screwed it down. Time to pick up the tools, wrap up the cord, and hurry back in to hit the books. Always something to do.

But then it hit me: don't do anything. Just be, just for a moment. I don't do that often. Do you?

I sat on the corner of the sandbox. I had all outdoors to myself. I watched the clouds come over the fiercely waving trees. I looked around the browning garden (so many tomatoes left!), over the yard that stayed green all summer, my maples toughening up where four years ago was a beanfield, the lake all white-cappy in the distance.

Best view in the world. I sat on the corner of that sandbox, built for another of the reasons that I'm the happiest man in Lake County, and took it all in.

At the same time, a friend of mine was sitting alone in a cemetery. Well, alone is open to interpretation. My friend was the only living soul here, but he had come to spend time with his dad. He hadn't visited this spot, this town, this state since the funeral years ago.

Funerals are like weddings: you don't get to talk to anyone. When you're the bride or groom, your attention is everywhere and nowhere. You're either greeting and hugging and toasting and dancing, or you're so thunderstruck by what just happened and what's going to happen (not just tonight, but forever after) that you don't really notice anyone but that amazing person beside you.

Same thing happens when you're the center of attention at a funeral. You're in a box. Kinda tough to talk.

You also can't talk much when you're in charge of the funeral, as was my friend, years ago, by the flipside of primogeniture. You're playing the good host. You're handling details. You're on autopilot, patting shoulders and thanking well-wishers while making sure the show goes smoothly and the checks get written. Then you have to rush back to your job to catch up on a few days' work so unexpectedly missed, clean out the fridge that needed cleaning before you got that awful call...

...and a few days, or a few years later, you realize you never took time to grieve. Forget your cousins or that old girlfriend in town—you never took time to talk to yourself, or to the spirit of the man you buried.

That's why my friend was at the cemetery yesterday. Away from kids and grandkids, away from job and dear wife (who told him this trip was a good idea), he just sat. For a long time. Amid the stones. Under an autumn sky turning from blue to ragged gray.

What words he uttered, what thoughts he thought... his business.

But later, past midnight, he sat outside again and watched that thunderstorm coming on. Yeah, last night's storm, the one that interrupted my sleep not by its own power but through the unconscious flopping of a three year old who thinks the proper place to spend a thunderstorm is between Mom and Dad (not so unreasonable an opinion, is it?). My friend had no one to beat him 'round the pate: he had a camp cabin and the entire state park to himself. He hadn't been out in a storm for quite some time. He watched this thunderboomer advance from the southwest, with its constant barrage of lightning. He ducked inside when the rain and hail came gusting down.

And then, alone on a thin mattress and a foam pad from Pamida, he slept. Deeply. Peacefully. Better than he has slept in years.

Sandbox. Cemetery. Thunderstorm. Two men at peace.

I don't believe in cosmic connections. I don't feel the need. But I'm still happy to tell stories, and invite others to construct their own meanings, cosmic or otherwise.

And yes, I'll check with Dad, to make sure what I'm constructing will hold up.